This is not an inaccurate description of many scientists today, for whom the deeper meaning of science remains elusive in an ever-changing yet constant world. If religion is ineffective, the new gods of atheism, agnosticism and authoritarianism are equally without worth, and he describes the modish sceptic as someone for whom nothing is serious and who “drifts along confusedly, hoping for the best, expecting little and believing in nothing very much”. Speaking amid the gathering storm of the impending war in Europe, he is disappointed by the moral inadequacy and destructive political consequences of established faiths, and states that “nothing is as hostile to religions as other religions”. Radhakrishnan exposes the inadequacy of existing religions and contrasts them with science, which “demands induction from facts and not deduction from dogmas”. without intuitive cognition, the intellect would not be certain of the. The book weaves a spiritual approach through its metaphysical argument, also adopting a scientific attitude, to produce a bold view of creative thinking. that his theory of intuition leads to skepticism, it was not his account of the.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |